PSYSICAL EXAMINATION.
FUNCTIONAL EXAMINATION.
COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT.
SOCIAL AND AFFECTIVE ASSESSMENT
Comprehensive geriatric
assessment in geriatric patients is the key tool that evaluates the physical,
mental, social and functional area.
In this assessment we collect
the most important health problems in the elderly and we review the medications
they take daily.
We will perform health
promotion and prevention activities.
We will value the functional
area, which is the process that is aimed to collect information about the
ability of the elderly to maintain their independence and practice their
habitual activity.
In this area one of the scales
that we will use is the Katz index that appreciates the daily living
activities.
It is a qualitative scale
consists of 6 items.
- bath
- Dressing / undressing
- the toilet use
- mobility
- continence
- food
A study was made in which they
wanted to know the functional capacity of elderly patients by Katz index and
know the reliability of this index in the primary care setting.
It was performed in Oviedo, it was a descriptive cross-sectional study with patients older than 65 years, health center users from Otero. There, the elderly population is 12, 86% of the population that goes to the center.
It was performed in Oviedo, it was a descriptive cross-sectional study with patients older than 65 years, health center users from Otero. There, the elderly population is 12, 86% of the population that goes to the center.
The key findings related to the
Katz index say that it is a method for assessing the functional capacity of the
elderly reliably in the primary care environment and it can be used by any
professional in the team.
Moreover we will assess the
clinical area. Within this area we will make the anamnesis, which include:
- A personal history.
- Review of equipment and systems to the needs of Virginia Henderson.
- Complete drug history.
- Nutritional history.
In this last section we can
include nutritional evaluation by Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA).
This test is valued with a
maximum of 30 points: <17 points indicates poor nutritional status, 17 to
23.5 risk of malnutrition and if the score is higher than 24 means a good
health.
This is a very interesting post. I think the study has a very high scientific basis and I think we should know more.
ResponderEliminar